So, the "serious man" and the "rhetorical
man." I think my opinion is a mix of Kelly and Jared. I think the
serious man is not aware that they are using rhetoric in their everyday
actions. I like what Kelly added about the "serious" person heavily
utilizing ethos and logos over pathos. I imagine the rhetorical man would
heavily and purposefully integrate ethos, pathos, and logos, with a
heavy emphasis on pathos. A serious man would approach a problem and try
to find the most practical, to the point solution. A rhetorical man on the
other hand would put much more time and thought into such an issue, and I think
they would come up with a rather creative solution.
I also see where Jared
is coming from about the serious man as well, maybe the user is aware of rhetoric but they just do not
approach rhetoric through the same lens at the serious person. If the serious man is aware of rhetoric but chooses not to see it, this may be interpreted as ignorance by some but others may see this as just a utilization of a different
mindset.
As we all obviously know, everyone uses rhetoric in
everything. Serious men, however, have a different awareness level of
how they use rhetoric than the rhetorical man. Regardless of if they know
recognize the concept of rhetoric or not, the end point is that they do not
choose to consciously integrate such concepts into their life. Rhetorical men
on the other hand obviously do the exact opposite, and fully embrace the many
niches of rhetoric. As Jared said, he believes rhetorical men are the eloquent
thinkers and reason based, and I can understand where he is coming from with
that statement. I also noted what Kelly said about the serious men, not even
thinking to utilize pathos. I agree with that as well, it seems to me that
serious men are trained to approach situations in a very specific way that does
not quite include emotion.
No comments:
Post a Comment